Home

www.pastfilms.com 


Re: 'Baby Doll' 1956 Posted on: Injection- Fri, 3 Sep 2010 14:07:31 +0000 (UTC)

On Thu, 2 Sep 2010 19:41:38 -0700 (PDT), calvin
wrote:

>> It's a funny picture with sophistication & vitality. It's a far more
>> believable vision of a homespun Walpurgisnacht than Albee's "Who's
>> Afraid of Virginia Woolf" or Williams's "Summer & Smoke."
>
>Please. 'Summer and Smoke', maybe, I don't remember it that well.
>But Albee's masterpiece? Not even on the same planet. I wonder
>if the original cast performance of 'Virginia Woolf' is still
>available.

It's riveting, certainly, in its best moments (which tend not to be
the screamfests but the quieter expressions of sarcasm), but
practically none of it is believable to me--least of all the
metaphysical mumbo-jumbo about the son.
723894. Re: 'Baby Doll' 1956
723895. Re: 'Baby Doll' 1956
723896. Re: 'Baby Doll' 1956
723897. Re: 'Baby Doll' 1956
723898. Re: 'Baby Doll' 1956
723899. Re: 'Baby Doll' 1956
723900. Re: 'Baby Doll' 1956
723901. Re: 'Baby Doll' 1956
723902. Re: 'Baby Doll' 1956
723903. Re: 'Baby Doll' 1956
723904. Re: 'Baby Doll' 1956
723905. Re: 'Baby Doll' 1956
723906. Re: 'Baby Doll' 1956
723907. Re: 'Baby Doll' 1956
723908. Re: 'Baby Doll' 1956
723909. Re: 'Baby Doll' 1956
723910. Re: 'Baby Doll' 1956
723911. Re: 'Baby Doll' 1956
723912. Re: 'Baby Doll' 1956
723913. Re: 'Baby Doll' 1956