On Mar 8, 4:50=A0pm, Marko Amnell wrote:
> On Mar 9, 2:21=A0am, CliffB wrote:
>
> > Or just the usual sentimental nods and pet cause feel-good picks?
>
> > Hurt Locker manic euphoria; [...]
>
> The six Oscars for "The Hurt Locker" shows that accuracy
> means absolutely nothing when it comes to the popular and
> critical success of movies about the military. "The Hurt Locker"
> is one of the most inaccurate depictions of the military ever
> filmed, with American veterans' groups outraged at all the
> mistakes. =A0http://tinyurl.com/ydkbf7a
> Anyone with any basic knowledge of modern warfare will
> be extremely annoyed at all the mistakes. But these mistakes
> are all excused because supposedly they were necessary
> to create drama. Sorry, but I prefer films that achieve
> drama while sticking to the basic facts about the military.
>
> The fact that "The Hurt Locker" is basically a propaganda
> movie for an illegal war of aggression
ROFL, thanks for making the case for the Hurt Locker even stronger,
idiot. Try not to cry :)
makes its triumph
> at the Oscars even more tasteless.
|