Home

www.pastfilms.com 

Re: SO WHY DIDNT INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS WIN AGAIN? Posted on: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 18:24:11 EET

Anim8rFSK wrote:
>> I liked her at "The Net" a lot.
>
> I think 'compelling' is a good word for Sandy.

I'd rather use the terms "girl next door" and ".able"...
712256. Re: SO WHY DIDNT INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS WIN AGAIN?
712257. Re: SO WHY DIDNT INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS WIN AGAIN?
712258. Re: SO WHY DIDNT INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS WIN AGAIN?
712259. Re: SO WHY DIDNT INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS WIN AGAIN?
712260. Re: SO WHY DIDNT INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS WIN AGAIN?
712261. Re: SO WHY DIDNT INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS WIN AGAIN?
712262. Re: SO WHY DIDNT INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS WIN AGAIN?
712263. Re: SO WHY DIDNT INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS WIN AGAIN?
712264. Re: SO WHY DIDNT INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS WIN AGAIN?
712265. Re: SO WHY DIDNT INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS WIN AGAIN?
712266. Re: SO WHY DIDNT INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS WIN AGAIN?
712267. Re: SO WHY DIDNT INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS WIN AGAIN?
712268. Re: SO WHY DIDNT INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS WIN AGAIN?
712269. Re: SO WHY DIDNT INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS WIN AGAIN?
712270. Re: SO WHY DIDNT INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS WIN AGAIN?
712271. Re: SO WHY DIDNT INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS WIN AGAIN?
712272. Re: SO WHY DIDNT INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS WIN AGAIN?
712273. Re: SO WHY DIDNT INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS WIN AGAIN?
712274. Re: SO WHY DIDNT INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS WIN AGAIN?
712275. Re: SO WHY DIDNT INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS WIN AGAIN?