|
| Re: "Tonight, Another, *FIRST*, For The Oscars....!!"
|
Posted on: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 08:03:39 -0800
|
On 2010-03-09 00:46:27 -0800, The Late And Great Chafey Narquois
Barbeau Brassiere said:
[ I converted your poetry spacing to narrative below. ]
> I want the Oscars to go ahead and award an award to each and every
> minority and//or to a woman (in any categories that they haven't been
> awarded in, yet)--: So, that I never ever have to hear, *ever* again--:
> "Tonight, may be a *FIRST*, for this category, a woman or minority may
> win blah blah blah....".
I found it irritting as well, but curiously my wife didn't. Since
women constitute a large percentage of movie-goers, Academy voters, and
viewers of the AA shows, you can see how that would be a notable
marketing aspect.
> Who cares!!
Certainly women and black folk do, as they are rarely in the running.
It's a competition, right? So having anything at all that is novel in
the competition provides some kind of purported excitement. Note at
the triple stakes races there's a boatload of blabber about a gelding
or a mare in the competition--it's a rarity. Rarity and novelty sell
damn near everything in the USA.
> Just get it all over with. Award the awards to whatever category of
> humans, that haven't got it yet, so we can move on and those boring
> presenters can talk about something that will actually be entertaining
> to freaking watch and hear,
Like what? Their clothes? Lame humor? Cut-away shots of bored
celebrities? If I'm following you here, you'd like it to be more like a
board-meeting of a financial institution or something? Most people want
excitement, novelty, suspense--even if it's bogus as television usually
provides. They are, after all, trying to make inject something
interesting into--reading the results of a poll! Clearly they have not
made it YOUR kind of interesting. But somebody seems to like it.
Now that you've established what you don't want, can you say what it is
you would like? Just read the winners and everybody go home? Or maybe
just announce them on the radio? Or more dancing and singing? Maye
juggling or a dog-act?
> I look forward to the day, when those handicapped workers at McDonald's
> are given a chance in Hollywood!! Award them some Oscars, too.
First they have to be involved in the making of movies, then they have
to gains some press for their deeds. If that happens you can be sure
handicapped personnel, will get as much hoopla as the press can manage.
> "For effectively acting like he washed his hands by wetting his fingers
> and palms with his tongue....--: The Oscar goes to, 'Corky
> McFleugel'....!!
No, they still have to be involved in film production. They don't give
Academy Awards to folks in other industries.
--
-- Beware the delicate, tiny, very talented celebrity starlets.
|
712251. Re: "Tonight, Another, *FIRST*, For The Oscars....!!"
712252. Re: "Tonight, Another, *FIRST*, For The Oscars....!!"
712253. Re: "Tonight, Another, *FIRST*, For The Oscars....!!"
712254. Re: "Tonight, Another, *FIRST*, For The Oscars....!!"
712255. Re: "Tonight, Another, *FIRST*, For The Oscars....!!"
712256. Re: "Tonight, Another, *FIRST*, For The Oscars....!!"
712257. Re: "Tonight, Another, *FIRST*, For The Oscars....!!"
712258. Re: "Tonight, Another, *FIRST*, For The Oscars....!!"
712259. Re: "Tonight, Another, *FIRST*, For The Oscars....!!"
712260. Re: "Tonight, Another, *FIRST*, For The Oscars....!!"
712261. Re: "Tonight, Another, *FIRST*, For The Oscars....!!"
712262. Re: "Tonight, Another, *FIRST*, For The Oscars....!!"
712263. Re: "Tonight, Another, *FIRST*, For The Oscars....!!"
712264. Re: "Tonight, Another, *FIRST*, For The Oscars....!!"
712265. Re: "Tonight, Another, *FIRST*, For The Oscars....!!"
712266. Re: "Tonight, Another, *FIRST*, For The Oscars....!!"
712267. Re: "Tonight, Another, *FIRST*, For The Oscars....!!"
712268. Re: "Tonight, Another, *FIRST*, For The Oscars....!!"
712269. Re: "Tonight, Another, *FIRST*, For The Oscars....!!"
712270. Re: "Tonight, Another, *FIRST*, For The Oscars....!!"
|
|
| |