On Mar 8, 1:28=A0pm, TT wrote:
> MichaelW wrote:
> > What this comes down to really, is the most people can't think of war
> > movies that are worse than Hurt Locker. Is it not worth seing then?
>
> I think it's entertaining and worth seeing, just not Best Picture
> material. I rate it a 6-7.
>
> There are many worse, how about "Tears of the Sun"?http://www.imdb.com/ti=
tle/tt0314353/
But then the question arises: Which of last year's movies *were* B.P.
material?... (recognizing that, of the two that were 3-D, one derived
much of its audience appeal from that still-gimmick...)
--
- - - - - - - -
YOUR taste at work...
http://www.moviepig.com |