What this comes down to really, is the most people can't think of war movies
that are worse than Hurt Locker. Is it not worth seing then?
--
http://www.booksie.com/michael_wynn (my humble self)
www.TheEnglishCollection.com
"TT" skrev i melding
news:pv9ln.12923$pL1.23@uutiset.elisa.fi...
> Here are my 35 war films better than Hurt Locker:
>
>
> Cross of Iron (1977) 10
> Das Boot (1981) 10
> Kelly's Heroes (1970) 10
> Glory (1989) 9
> Southern Comfort (1981) 9
> The Bridge on the River Kwai (1957) 9
> Tuntematon sotilas (1955) 9
> 300 (2006) 8
> Casualties of War (1989) 8
> Enemy at the Gates (2001) 8
> Full Metal Jacket (1987) 8
> Heartbreak Ridge (1986) 8
> Paths of Glory (1957) 8
> Rukajärven tie (1999) 8
> Stripes (1981) 8
> The Deer Hunter (1978) 8
> The Dirty Dozen (1967) 8
> The Eagle Has Landed (1976) 8
> The Guns of Navarone (1961) 8
> The Killing Fields (1984) 8
> The Train (1964) 8
> Where Eagles Dare (1968) 8
> Apocalypse Now (1979) 7
> Behind Enemy Lines (2001) 7
> Black Hawk Down (2001) 7
> From Here to Eternity (1953) 7
> Gunga Din (1939) 7
> Hanover Street (1979) 7
> In Enemy Hands (2004) 7
> Patton (1970) 7
> Pearl Harbor (2001) 7
> Platoon (1986) 7
> Saving Private Ryan (1998) 7
> The Big Red One (1980) 7
> The Siege of Firebase Gloria (1989) 7
>
>
> Pay no attention to numbers :-P
>
> The list doesn't include such great movies as Schindler's list, The
> Downfall, Crimson Tide etc that don't have actual fighting sequences. Not
> sure if River Kwai has any...But yes, Stripes does have some although it's
> rather borderline to be considered a "war movie"...
> Also movies that I haven't seen in past decade or so are not included,
> naturally.
|