Home

www.pastfilms.com 


Re: SO WHY DIDNT INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS WIN AGAIN? Posted on: Injection- Mon, 8 Mar 2010 18:03:40 +0000 (UTC)

On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 07:26:31 -0800 (PST), Sir Blob
wrote:

>quality-wise, too, it falls into the usual trend, the weaker link
>winning for not posing a threat and its lack of subtlety, shakespeare
>in vote cuz the war pic voters got divided into thin blue line and
>saving private ryan, the english patient over secrets and lies,
>american beauty over the insider, crash over brokeback mountain,
>beautiful mind over in the bedroom, apollo 13 over sense and
>sensibility, forrest gump over pulp fiction..

. . . wuthering heights over juarez . . .
712137. Re: SO WHY DIDNT INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS WIN AGAIN?
712138. Re: SO WHY DIDNT INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS WIN AGAIN?
712139. Re: SO WHY DIDNT INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS WIN AGAIN?
712140. Re: SO WHY DIDNT INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS WIN AGAIN?
712141. Re: SO WHY DIDNT INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS WIN AGAIN?
712142. Re: SO WHY DIDNT INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS WIN AGAIN?
712143. Re: SO WHY DIDNT INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS WIN AGAIN?
712144. Re: SO WHY DIDNT INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS WIN AGAIN?
712145. Re: SO WHY DIDNT INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS WIN AGAIN?
712146. Re: SO WHY DIDNT INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS WIN AGAIN?
712147. Re: SO WHY DIDNT INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS WIN AGAIN?
712148. Re: SO WHY DIDNT INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS WIN AGAIN?
712149. Re: SO WHY DIDNT INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS WIN AGAIN?
712150. Re: SO WHY DIDNT INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS WIN AGAIN?
712151. Re: SO WHY DIDNT INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS WIN AGAIN?
712152. Re: SO WHY DIDNT INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS WIN AGAIN?
712153. Re: SO WHY DIDNT INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS WIN AGAIN?
712154. Re: SO WHY DIDNT INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS WIN AGAIN?
712155. Re: SO WHY DIDNT INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS WIN AGAIN?
712156. Re: SO WHY DIDNT INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS WIN AGAIN?