Home

www.pastfilms.com 


Re: PING-> Pig-man Posted on: Sat, 6 Feb 2010 19:31:20 +0000 (UTC)

On Feb 5, 10:27=A0am, moviePig wrote:
> On Feb 5, 11:24=A0am, "miker" wrote:
>
> > <>
>
> > Ok. :)
>
> > How about, you get panhandled for $5 by someone with a good story, and =
feel
> > coerced because you don't want to look cheap to the people you're with,=
or
> > because you're alone and he's bigger. That's a sort of coercion. And th=
en
> > the guy looks at you and says "With another buck I could get some bette=
r
> > food..." haha.
>
> > I once got panhandled by a guy who approached me with a fistful of doll=
ars;
> > he held them out and wanted to know if I had a ten. Turns out he had on=
ly
> > eight to trade for it...
>
> He offered a fistful of dollars for a few dollars more. =A0Hmm, I wonder
> if he was good, bad, or ugly...
>


You're good. You're very, very good!

Thanks for... er... making my day!

Tom
709950. Re: PING-> Pig-man
709951. Re: PING-> Pig-man
709952. Re: PING-> Pig-man
709953. Re: PING-> Pig-man
709954. Re: PING-> Pig-man
709955. Re: PING-> Pig-man
709956. Re: PING-> Pig-man
709957. Re: PING-> Pig-man
709958. Re: PING-> Pig-man
709959. Re: PING-> Pig-man
709960. Re: PING-> Pig-man
709961. Re: PING-> Pig-man
709962. Re: PING-> Pig-man
709963. Re: PING-> Pig-man
709964. Re: PING-> Pig-man
709965. Re: PING-> Pig-man
709966. Re: PING-> Pig-man
709967. Re: PING-> Pig-man
709968. Re: PING-> Pig-man
709969. Re: PING-> Pig-man