Home

www.pastfilms.com 


Re: PING-> Pig-man Posted on: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 02:38:10 +0000 (UTC)

On Feb 3, 1:13=A0pm, "steve" wrote:
> On =A03-Feb-2010, Tom wrote:
>
> > I can guarantee you to a person, the LA educated people are much
> > deeper thinkers than the scientific types.
>
> I believe that to be a leftist conceit. Libertarians and many conservativ=
es
> are well versed in issues of liberty and economics...far more so than
> leaders on the left. =A0Plenty of deep thought involved, there.
>
> > Goldberg would disagree with President Obama or any other non-
> > conservative even if they said rain was wet. Goldberg is the ideologue
> > and like others of his ilk, he's trying to make something out of
> > nothing. He and his like only want to confuse and obfuscate to get
> > those who listen to them to act against their own best interests.
> > Goldberg and his brethren wouldn't know a fact if it fell in their
> > collective laps. They do know the truth, however. How else would they
> > be so adept at avoiding it?
>
> Vague accusations of falsehood. =A0Got anthing concrete?
> --



Oh, I forgot this...

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2010/2/2/832988/-The-2010-Comprehensive-Daily=
-Kos-Research-2000-Poll-of-Self-Identified-Republicans

Tom
709769. Re: PING-> Pig-man
709770. Re: PING-> Pig-man
709771. Re: PING-> Pig-man
709772. Re: PING-> Pig-man
709773. Re: PING-> Pig-man
709774. Re: PING-> Pig-man
709775. Re: PING-> Pig-man
709776. Re: PING-> Pig-man
709777. Re: PING-> Pig-man
709778. Re: PING-> Pig-man
709779. Re: PING-> Pig-man
709780. Re: PING-> Pig-man
709781. Re: PING-> Pig-man
709782. Re: PING-> Pig-man
709783. Re: PING-> Pig-man
709784. Re: PING-> Pig-man
709785. Re: PING-> Pig-man
709786. Re: PING-> Pig-man
709787. Re: PING-> Pig-man
709788. Re: PING-> Pig-man