On 4 feb, 19:38, David Oberman wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 16:14:11 GMT, "steve" wrote:
> >Personally, I observe that many people
> >want us all to be our brothers keeper, but I do not agree with thier val=
ue
> >judgement and would take no steps to implement thier vision. =A0I reject=
thier
> >ideology, therefore I take no pragmatic steps in its furtherance.
>
> steve, would you lend me five bucks if I needed a hot meal? I'd help
> you out! Wouldn't you do the same for me?
as you well know, stewe's a demagogic spastic. for example, if i want
windows 7, should i
1. download it for free?
2. pay charity to bill gates?
wot stewe's really saying is he condescendingly defines what charity
is, what unnecessary consumerism is, and like a hegelian rightard, if
the real doesnt accord to language, well the real can go . itself,
so its like being condescended to by sasha grey |