Home

www.pastfilms.com 


Re: Goddamned Hollywood is pretty much worthless! Posted on: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 19:23:56 +0000 (UTC)

On Sep 20, 3:23 pm, le...@my-deja.com wrote:
> On Sep 20, 11:50 am, "Kingo Gondo"
> wrote:
>
> >http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/194711/movies
>
> Wow, Budd Schulberg wrote that 60 years ago. Why doesn't the Atlantic
> commission him to write an update? Schulberg's still around (he's 93,
> but still writing).

To add to the above, he's probably sorry he ever complained about the
things he DID complain about, given that movies have gotten much, much
worse.
602123. Re: Goddamned Hollywood is pretty much worthless!
602124. Re: Goddamned Hollywood is pretty much worthless!
602125. Re: Goddamned Hollywood is pretty much worthless!
602126. Re: Goddamned Hollywood is pretty much worthless!
602127. Re: Goddamned Hollywood is pretty much worthless!
602128. Re: Goddamned Hollywood is pretty much worthless!
602129. Re: Goddamned Hollywood is pretty much worthless!
602130. Re: Goddamned Hollywood is pretty much worthless!
602131. Re: Goddamned Hollywood is pretty much worthless!
602132. Re: Goddamned Hollywood is pretty much worthless!
602133. Re: Goddamned Hollywood is pretty much worthless!
602134. Re: Goddamned Hollywood is pretty much worthless!
602135. Re: Goddamned Hollywood is pretty much worthless!
602136. Re: Goddamned Hollywood is pretty much worthless!
602137. Re: Goddamned Hollywood is pretty much worthless!
602138. Re: Goddamned Hollywood is pretty much worthless!
602139. Re: Goddamned Hollywood is pretty much worthless!
602140. Re: Goddamned Hollywood is pretty much worthless!
602141. Re: Goddamned Hollywood is pretty much worthless!
602142. Re: Goddamned Hollywood is pretty much worthless!