Home

www.pastfilms.com 


Re: being ... doesn't mean you gotta be pro-... agenda. Posted on: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 22:30:16 +0000 (UTC)

On Sep 19, 6:12 pm, Martin Koolhoven
wrote:
> > This is basic knowledge.
>
> Is it?http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2006600199,00.htmlhttp://abcnews.go.com/GMA/OnCall/story?id=1469078
>
> No idea how serious this is. But it makes your claim at least
> debatable.
>
> MK

Hunh. You know, it could just be another stereotype, in the same vein
as the Madonna/Whore complex type/good women aren't supposed to like
. idea.

This suggests that men are more likely to have multiple partners than
women, however:

http://www.statistics.gov.uk/cci/nugget.asp?id=411

601967. Re: being ... doesn't mean you gotta be pro-... agenda.
601968. Re: being ... doesn't mean you gotta be pro-... agenda.
601969. Re: being ... doesn't mean you gotta be pro-... agenda.
601970. Re: being ... doesn't mean you gotta be pro-... agenda.
601971. Re: being ... doesn't mean you gotta be pro-... agenda.
601972. Re: being ... doesn't mean you gotta be pro-... agenda.
601973. Re: being ... doesn't mean you gotta be pro-... agenda.
601974. Re: being ... doesn't mean you gotta be pro-... agenda.
601975. Re: being ... doesn't mean you gotta be pro-... agenda.
601976. Re: being ... doesn't mean you gotta be pro-... agenda.
601977. Re: being ... doesn't mean you gotta be pro-... agenda.
601978. Re: being ... doesn't mean you gotta be pro-... agenda.
601979. Re: being ... doesn't mean you gotta be pro-... agenda.
601980. Re: being ... doesn't mean you gotta be pro-... agenda.
601981. Re: being ... doesn't mean you gotta be pro-... agenda.
601982. Re: being ... doesn't mean you gotta be pro-... agenda.
601983. Re: being ... doesn't mean you gotta be pro-... agenda.
601984. Re: being ... doesn't mean you gotta be pro-... agenda.
601985. Re: being ... doesn't mean you gotta be pro-... agenda.
601986. Re: being ... doesn't mean you gotta be pro-... agenda.