On 17 sep, 02:22, kfw1...@yahoo.com wrote:
> On Sep 16, 5:41 pm, Martin Koolhoven
> wrote:
>
> > Let;s scrutinize your source:
> > "Few studies employed control groups and most had small samples. "
> > So some did. Why only talk about the ones that didn't?
>
> I can onlyume that those studies had some of the other problems
> mentioned.
That's quite anumption.
> > You have a point. I guess it comes down to who you believe here. The
> > one who are against ...s for religious reasons or the one who is
> > willing to stand up for their rights. My money is on the last one.
>
> In other words, you see the one side as liberators and the other side
> (falsely) as oppressors, and for that reason you truth the data of one
> side and not that of the other. Do I need to point out why that's
> illogical?
Yes please.
I do see the religious right as the oppressors, since they have a long
history of denying any ... rights. If they are the only ones coming up
with arguements against ... marriage, I can't help but be sceptical.
MK
|